Tuesday, 1 March 2016

Parse Shutdown: What are my Options to Replace Parse?

Parse’s latest shutdown has come across as a shock to many. So what is the next step if you are currently using Parse for your backend? Most of the developers and mobile application development companies are facing this dilemma. Read more to find out the options you can choose from to replace Parse.

Are you a Parse user and you are in a complete fix as to what is the next step to be done in order to replace Parse for your current backend. Almost all the mobile app developers and mobile app development companies are facing a major dilemma when it comes to Parse migration and Parse alternatives. Here’s a list of the major pros and cons to the most popular Parse alternatives.
Parse Migration Services
Alternative 1: Build a Custom Backend
This option simply means you get to build your own backend which also includes your own API as well as database.

The good part:
It’s a popular Parse alternative and is a highly preferred option when it comes to Parse migration as you get to build whatever you want with the exact customized specifications according to your application.

The bad:
Expensive! This option to as a Parse alternative can get expensive. The main reason you were using Parse as a backend was solely to save money.

Why opt for a custom backend?
ü  If you were wanting to change to a custom backend, right now is an ideal opportunity. Numerous new businesses use Parse for their MVP stage to eliminate costs, then inevitably change to a custom alternative. On the off chance that you are prepared to scale, changing to a custom backend will be the best long haul cost saver and can give your product a great boost in terms of performance.

ü  If you are a Parse power user and have keep running into its impediments such as we have, this would be a great time to go custom. The same performance issues will happen with alternate options, and going the custom route will permit you to optimize for maximum performance.

Alternative 2: Use MongoDB in addition to Parse's Open Source Server – Basically, host your own particular Parse server.

•        Pros:
ü  You can keep your information utilizing Parse's migration device.
ü  You can continue utilizing Parse's server, which will roll out for less application developments.

ü  You will have more control and custom alternatives since it will be a custom backend utilizing Parse's server.
•        Cons:           
ü  You can continue utilizing Parse's API – yes, this is both a Pro and Con. Parse's API has a considerable measure of known issues, and they will tail you in the event that you take this alternative.
ü  You still need to have and make your own backend to bolster the MongoDB and API, which takes both time and cash.

•        Why use MongoDB in addition to Parse's Server?
ü  If you truly need to keep your information in place, this is the best alternative. Parse even gives the device to migrate.
ü  If you need to go custom, yet don't have the assets important to get the distance there, this is a more reasonable center ground.

Alternative 3: Firebase – Web and mobile application backend with a NoSQL database like Parse

a.    It is fundamentally the same to Parse in usefulness and client experience.
b.    There is a complementary plan similar to Parse's complementary plan.
c.    You still have constraints in what you can do (like Parse).
d.    Who is to say Firebase won't overlay one year from now, as well?

·         Why use Firebase?
ü  If your application runs well on Parse, or in the event that you don't have to scale for some time (or ever), Firebase is unquestionably the best approach.
ü  This is likely the least cost choice for most applications on Parse at this moment.

Hence, the above three options are the most popular choices when it comes to Parse migration and if you are on the lookout for Parse alternatives.

No comments:

Post a Comment