Parse’s latest shutdown has come across
as a shock to many. So what is the next step if you are currently using Parse
for your backend? Most of the developers and mobile application development
companies are facing this dilemma. Read more to find out the options you can
choose from to replace Parse.
Are you a Parse user and you are in a
complete fix as to what is the next step to be done in order to replace Parse
for your current backend. Almost all the mobile app developers and mobile app
development companies are facing a major dilemma when it comes to Parse migration and Parse alternatives. Here’s a list of the
major pros and cons to the most popular Parse alternatives.
 |
| Parse Migration Services |
Alternative 1:
Build a Custom Backend
This option simply means you get to build
your own backend which also includes your own API as well as database.
The good part:
It’s a popular Parse alternative and is a
highly preferred option when it comes to Parse migration as you get to build whatever you want with the exact customized
specifications according to your application.
The bad:
Expensive! This option to as a Parse alternative can get expensive.
The main reason you were using Parse as a backend was solely to save money.
Why opt for a
custom backend?
ü If you were
wanting to change to a custom backend, right now is an ideal opportunity.
Numerous new businesses use Parse for their MVP stage to eliminate costs, then
inevitably change to a custom alternative. On the off chance that you are
prepared to scale, changing to a custom backend will be the best long haul cost
saver and can give your product a great boost in terms of performance.
ü If you are a
Parse power user and have keep running into its impediments such as we have,
this would be a great time to go custom. The same performance issues will
happen with alternate options, and going the custom route will permit you to
optimize for maximum performance.
Alternative 2: Use MongoDB in
addition to Parse's Open Source Server – Basically, host your own particular
Parse server.
•
Pros:
ü You can keep your
information utilizing Parse's migration device.
ü You can continue
utilizing Parse's server, which will roll out for less application
developments.
ü You will have
more control and custom alternatives since it will be a custom backend
utilizing Parse's server.
•
Cons:
ü You can continue
utilizing Parse's API – yes, this is both a Pro and Con. Parse's API has a
considerable measure of known issues, and they will tail you in the event that
you take this alternative.
ü You still need to
have and make your own backend to bolster the MongoDB and API, which takes both
time and cash.
•
Why use MongoDB in addition to
Parse's Server?
ü If you truly need
to keep your information in place, this is the best alternative. Parse even
gives the device to migrate.
ü If you need to go
custom, yet don't have the assets important to get the distance there, this is
a more reasonable center ground.
Alternative 3: Firebase – Web
and mobile application backend with a NoSQL database like Parse
Pros:
a. It is
fundamentally the same to Parse in usefulness and client experience.
b. There is a
complementary plan similar to Parse's complementary plan.
Cons:
c. You still have
constraints in what you can do (like Parse).
d. Who is to say
Firebase won't overlay one year from now, as well?
·
Why use Firebase?
ü If your
application runs well on Parse, or in the event that you don't have to scale
for some time (or ever), Firebase is unquestionably the best approach.
ü This is likely
the least cost choice for most applications on Parse at this moment.
Hence, the above three options are the
most popular choices when it comes to Parse
migration and if you are on the lookout for Parse alternatives.
