iPad vs Android Tablets: Reasons to Choose Android Over iOS

Android or iPad? That is the central issue since Android tablets took after the release of the iPad in 2010. Be that as it may, what makes buyer's pick an Android over iPad despite the fact that the last holds real piece of the overall industry? Apple has turned into a style proclamation and the standard carrier for usability, while for others it is more brand devotion that blocks them from changing to different items. Yet, similar to all machines the iPad is not idealize and is missing on a few focuses when contrasted with Android gadgets.

Here are some motivations to go for an Android tablet versus the Apple elective.   

1.  Different Features and Options

  

The Android controlled tablets are made by various organizations such as Samsung, HP, Dell, Motorola and Asus, which guarantees that there are numerous distinct options for the iPad.

iPads are accessible in a 9.7″ and 7.87″ size; while Android tablets are accessible in different sizes is only a little specimen of the numerous decisions that are accessible on the Android side.

The iPad stays away from multi-tasking with the end goal of sparing battery life and enhancing execution. It is something that was at long last offered by the second version. Be that as it may, you will discover Android tablets fueled by double center processors that make multitasking smart.

One thing that made some early adopters abhor the first iPad was that it had no camera, which is a component of most Android tablets – Apple just included the second era of the iPad. Still the nature of the camera has been kept to a base to guarantee better general execution of the iPad, while all Android tablets have front and back cameras, some of which have top of the line specs.  


2. Flash enabled 

In case you invest a lot of energy in the laptop watching video online and plan to do likewise on your tablet PC then you better select an Android tablet particularly in the event that you get to bunches of Flash empowered sites. iPad does not support flash content, which is the primary motivation behind why you can't observe every one of the recordings or perspective numerous sites utilizing this tablet. On the hand Androids, underpins flash content, which implies that you have the opportunity to scan the World Wide Web with no limitation against Flash-based sites or recordings. Also, in the event that you have a fast Internet association, looking over any of the browsing the Internet turns out to be so natural.

3. Easy Data-Storage & Transfer

The best way to exchange information to the iPad is utilizing an information link associated with a PC and adjusting it with the assistance of iTunes. In addition, there is no memory card space to support outside capacity, an element that Apple has left off deliberately. While all Android tablets have memory card spaces so that applications and recordings, pictures, and so on can be put away on the outside memory, not topping off interior memory. Additionally, numerous Android tablets likewise have USB ports to empower exchanging of data and files, which is a component that both iPads don't offer.

4. Replaceable Batteries 

Something that incensed me most about the iGadgets are its battery. It's not removable, and in the event that it goes, you need to get a radical new gadget. In case yours breaks and still happens to be under guarantee, Apple will send you another one — for an expense. For the iPad, if the battery goes, you can send in your old one and they'll send you another one for $99. Gracious, and ensure you matched up it before it kicked the bucket since when they send you out the new one it won't have any of your applications or individual data on it. On the off chance that you neglected to match up, you're S.O.L.

Android app developers provides their own particular batteries which are replaceable. In case the battery goes, you simply purchase another one. On the other hand, in case you're under guarantee, the maker can send you another one without bothering with taking your whole tablet. 


A Reason to continue utilizing an iPad

Despite the fact that iPad users might have a large number of motivations to incline toward it over Android tablets they can not negate the points of interest that Android has over iPad. One reason that can in any case keep you stick on an iPad is the way that Apple's applications store has a larger number of utilizations than the Android Market.

Despite the fact that in the previous year Android Market has expanded definitely in size with the well known iPad applications additionally accessible on Android tablets. Still, the iTune holds more applications and is an extremely alluring element that iPads bring to the table. 

Conclusion

The way that the iPad is the market pioneer going up against a large group of Android tablets is a remarkable accomplishment. Notwithstanding, iPad's piece of the pie is as of now being dissolving and anticipated that would diminish much speedier later on if Apple doesn't venture up their diversion and offer something that Android tablets have not as of now got the business sector.

15 Alternatives To Facebook’s Parse

Facebook declared that it would be closing down Parse, it popular mobile backend as a service (MBaaS) that it gained in 2013 for a reported $85 million.

Parse users do have an entire year to get their applications running on various framework. Luckily, there are numerous other cloud services to look over in case you would prefer not to detail with the intricacy of dealing with the hidden server and capacity base for your mobile applications.

Listed down are the Parse alternatives for developer’s consideration, alongside a touch of background data on every one:

1. AnyPresence: Established in 2011, AnyPresence has got a focus of enterprises. It underpins on-premises deployments. It declared a $6 million subsidizing round in September 2014.

2. Appcelerator: Established in 2006 and lately procured by Axway, Appcelerator provides its Arrow cloud service beginning at $259 per seat every month. Clients incorporate Cisco and VMware.

3.  AWS: Mobisoft has an aptitude of taking care of a large number of clients in facilitated environment with MongoDB groups as backend. It can be your optimal counseling partners for building an immaculate domain in cloud for your application. Consult Mobisoft to migrate your app to AWS.

4. Appery: Appery rolled out in 2012 initially under the name Tiggzi, as an item from Exadel, which began in 1998. More than 300,000 architects use it, and client incorporate Aetna, Konica Minolta, and Toyota.

5.Backendless: Established in 2012, Backendless has tackled less investment than some of its rivals, however "as of right now the business can subsidize itself," author and CEO Mark Piller wrote in a bolster gathering post a year ago. The expense of sending applications on top of numerous servers is not posted on the organization's website.

6.Built.io: Established in 2007, Built.io offers a backend that can be conveyed on Amazon Web Services, IBM SoftLayer, or VMware's vCloud Air.

7.CloudMine: Set up in 2011, CloudMine is as of now offering a unique solution to Parse clients to win their business. CloudMine has incorporated itself with Platform as a Service (PaaS) organization Apprenda and it declared a $5 million financing round in March 2015.

8.   FeedHenry: Set up in 2008, FeedHenry was gained by Red Hat in September 2014 for around $82 million.

9.Firebase: Set up in 2011, Firebase is an ongoing cloud backend with a solid developer after and facilitating for static resources in applications. It was gained by Google in October 2014.

10.Kii: Set up in 2007, Kii underpins on-premises and cloud computing. The organization concentrates on Internet of Things (IoT) applications specifically. Not long ago Kii reported that it had gotten financing from Cisco Investments.

11.Kinvey: Established in 2010, Kinvey has a few undertaking clients, and it's accessible for organization on-premises server farms, as well. The organization raised a $10.8 million round in September 2014. VMware utilized Kinvey's backend to convey a mobile offering in vCloud Air.

12.Kony: Established in 2007, Kony offers the MobileFabric MBaaS. Kony brought $50 million up in June 2014.

13.Kumulos: Established in 2010, Kumulos concentrates on giving MBaaS to organizations as an apparatus that they can white-mark for their own particular clients to utilize. Valuing, at $50 per application every month, just kicks in once applications are live.

14. moBack: Established in 2012 and presently promoting free service on its site, moBack can be sent on top of Amazon Web Services or on-premises server farm foundation.

15.Syncano: Established in 2011, Syncano declared a $5.5 million subsidizing round in September. It costs just $25 a month to run applications underway with Syncano.

Additionally, the Parse Server programming is currently accessible under an open source license, permitting you to set up a Parse-like ordeal on whatever framework you need.

Facebook Shuts down Parse: What this Means & What to Do?

In spite of the fact that, it's just a year left for Parse to shut down totally, it's a no-circumstance to stress over. In the event that you've embraced Parse for your application, you have various options when it comes to Parse migration and Parse migration services.

Looking back:

Parse, a MBaaS or a Mobile Backend as a Service, at first appeared on the scene in 2011 and grew so quickly that by 2012 it was being embraced by an immense number of mobile developers. In 2013, Facebook assumed control Parse and proceeded to control a reported 5 lakh applications.

In spite of the fact that it was the most prestigi

ous, Parse isn't the fundamental player in the SaaS (Software as a Service) section. Brands like Microsoft (Azure) and Amazon (AWS) have offerings.

Yet, the motivations behind why a lot of developers got pulled in and slanted towards Parse are as per the following:

• It’s anything but difficult to-use with amazingly and nearly better recorded SDKs;

• Cost successful services exceedingly aggressive;

• Instinctive backend section,

• and its competency to handle everything (like distributed computing, welcome mail, login validation , and push notices, so on.).

From enormous organizations to autonomous shops, Parse was the obvious choice to revive yield of MVPs, all SMEs, or specific components of huge name applications.

The conclusion of Parse-And the purpose for:

Came as a bewilderment to whole developers group and to n quantities of organizations, Parse proclaimed it's shutting down services and that clients should move their application(s) till one year from the date of declaration of its closing down (27'Jan, 2017). This is pressurizing relationship to completely consider their methodologies for backend and choose how they will construct their apps) in today's cloud-driven environ. It should also be seen that Parse gives an endorsed movement timetable which is significantly more commanding than the year they say they will keep the service on.

How?- Data moved to a self-facilitated MongoDB as on 28'April, 2016, Complete designing your self-facilitated Parse Server till 28'July, 2016 and move over a complete new application showing it.

Considering these dates, it shows up as the most smart methodology for organizations embracing Parse is to start understanding another new arrangement and to begin the migration process at the soonest opportunity.

What's next? If you are looking at Parse migration or searching for Parse migration services options:

Migrate and have your own Parse server: You're blessed if just your application backend totally created by Parse. It has given a Migration Guide to their as of late dispatched open-source server. Unfortunately, the new Parse Server doesn't give all the extraordinary elements that Parse had, yet it wouldn't be troublesome for a skilled Parse migration specialist to execute those components.

Take another SaaS as a choice: One noteworthy motivation behind why various developers picked Parse was that they might not want to set up and keep up a server. Remembering this with the way that some custom work may be required with a particular finished objective to thoroughly move to Parse Server, another SaaS may be a predominant arrangement. Clearly, data would be, in the end moved to the new arrangement, however Parse has given a database migration gadget that expected to make migration less troublesome.

Develop your own backend solution: If your application require to be scale and continues developing with custom needs, it may be a shrewd procedure to build your own specific backend. In this manner, you can keep up complete control and can impact it as a high ground. This may require contracting new masters, setting up your staff in new development stacks or employing outsourcing ability to make and keep up your framework, yet it in like manner frees your application and your business from dependence on another association.

Nutshell: Facebook is doing all that they can to give organizations time to move to distinct options for Parse migration services. Regardless, we need to consider as organizations need to completely consider concerning relying upon a SaaS arrangement. In developing top of SaaS, your application gets the opportunity to be committed to another association's lifecycle, from API approach changes to a whole closedown of services.

The Fight for Mobile App Market: The Android vs. iOS Question Answered

           

    The battle to gain supremacy has heated up the Mobile app market. It has now boiled down to the two lasting heavyweights. Android vs Ios. So now as a developer who would you vie for. Here are some figures that can help you in gouging the battle for supremacy. As of 2014, Gartner pegs the number of Android devices shipped at 1 billion. This on top of the 1.9 billion devices currently in service. So we are now talking about 3 billion active devices and a world of infinite opportunities.

In comparison, Gartner suggests that iOS shipped not more than 700 million devices and earlier 200 million have become deactivated. So Apple now has around 500 million active devices. So, will this mean Android overwhelmingly surpasses Apple. In terms of devices, certainly. But the real business lies in the app market. So where do they stand in the field of app revenue.

Figures matter – and iPhone App Developers Know That

Despite, 3 billion devices, Android have roughly 1.2 million apps in its Play Store the same as that of Apple. Expansion of the number of devices would not automatically mean the number of your apps increase too. Drilling further down, Android apps have been downloaded almost 80 billion times as of June 2014. While the number for Apple downloads stands at 75 billion times during that same period.

For a developer, it hence, becomes a dilemma of sorts. Android has the market and Apple the revenue. Citigroup estimates that Apple rakes in $5.1 million everyday from its store while Android does not do more than $1.1 million. So what makes Apple such a humongous revenue earner inspite not being in reckoning as far as numbers of shipped devices go?

Apple’s marketing blitz and what iPhone App Developers Need to Learn

The answer lies in the carefully crafted marketing that Apple is so famous for and of course extreme quality control. Apple apps are vetted before they are allowed to enter the store. Moreover, the Apple community is a closed door and knit community. Hence, it is tightly controlled. Developers are more likely to make more profit here than in Android primarily because Apple’s strength lies in marketing.

Android vs Apple: The Debate for iPhone App Developers

Apple has paid out almost $25 billion to developers over the past 6 years and have cornered $10 billion themselves. Though significantly lower than its massive IPhone sales revenue, it is not at all irrelevant.

The entire market is basically fragmented. The competition between Apple iOS and Google Android is on many platforms and across a few verticals. You have to consider the device market which Android has so successfully cornered. But, again numbers will not ensure that sales of apps will always be at the top. Apple does this well. Tightly controls its market and regulates its saes much better. Overabundance of Android devices has been a bane as much as it has been a boon.

What do iPhone App Developers Look For?

So coming back to the question previously asked. Who does a developer look to for sustenance? To begin with Apple iOS, because of the exposure it provides in terms of technical competence and high quality marketing. It also is far more profitable than Android. However, as you grow as a developer, do not limit yourself to Apple. Android as a market that is huge. Massive, will be the correct word. Use it to leverage the efficacy of your app. It will reach to a wider audience.

There is absolutely no well defined difference between who to choose from this two. As a developer, you need eventually aim to develop apps for both the Operating Systems; you simply can’t afford to separate out on the user base of one, unless your app is platform centric.

Hiring the right iPhone app developers will help you design creative and smartly designed apps for the iOS system that can help you increase user engagement and downloads.

Parse Shutdown: What are my Options to Replace Parse?

Parse’s latest shutdown has come across as a shock to many. So what is the next step if you are currently using Parse for your backend? Most of the developers and mobile application development companies are facing this dilemma. Read more to find out the options you can choose from to replace Parse.

Are you a Parse user and you are in a complete fix as to what is the next step to be done in order to replace Parse for your current backend. Almost all the mobile app developers and mobile app development companies are facing a major dilemma when it comes to Parse migration and Parse alternatives. Here’s a list of the major pros and cons to the most popular Parse alternatives.

Parse Migration Services

Alternative 1: Build a Custom Backend

This option simply means you get to build your own backend which also includes your own API as well as database.

The good part:

It’s a popular Parse alternative and is a highly preferred option when it comes to Parse migration as you get to build whatever you want with the exact customized specifications according to your application.

The bad:

Expensive! This option to as a Parse alternative can get expensive. The main reason you were using Parse as a backend was solely to save money.

Why opt for a custom backend?

ü  If you were wanting to change to a custom backend, right now is an ideal opportunity. Numerous new businesses use Parse for their MVP stage to eliminate costs, then inevitably change to a custom alternative. On the off chance that you are prepared to scale, changing to a custom backend will be the best long haul cost saver and can give your product a great boost in terms of performance.

ü  If you are a Parse power user and have keep running into its impediments such as we have, this would be a great time to go custom. The same performance issues will happen with alternate options, and going the custom route will permit you to optimize for maximum performance.

Alternative 2: Use MongoDB in addition to Parse's Open Source Server – Basically, host your own particular Parse server.

•        Pros:

ü  You can keep your information utilizing Parse's migration device.

ü  You can continue utilizing Parse's server, which will roll out for less application developments.

ü  You will have more control and custom alternatives since it will be a custom backend utilizing Parse's server.

•        Cons:           

ü  You can continue utilizing Parse's API – yes, this is both a Pro and Con. Parse's API has a considerable measure of known issues, and they will tail you in the event that you take this alternative.

ü  You still need to have and make your own backend to bolster the MongoDB and API, which takes both time and cash.

•        Why use MongoDB in addition to Parse's Server?

ü  If you truly need to keep your information in place, this is the best alternative. Parse even gives the device to migrate.

ü  If you need to go custom, yet don't have the assets important to get the distance there, this is a more reasonable center ground.

Alternative 3: Firebase – Web and mobile application backend with a NoSQL database like Parse

Pros:

a.    It is fundamentally the same to Parse in usefulness and client experience.

b.    There is a complementary plan similar to Parse's complementary plan.

Cons:

c.    You still have constraints in what you can do (like Parse).

d.    Who is to say Firebase won't overlay one year from now, as well?

         

·         Why use Firebase?

ü  If your application runs well on Parse, or in the event that you don't have to scale for some time (or ever), Firebase is unquestionably the best approach.

ü  This is likely the least cost choice for most applications on Parse at this moment.

Hence, the above three options are the most popular choices when it comes to Parse migration and if you are on the lookout for Parse alternatives.